- Quick Answer
- Why Money Laundering Cases in Thailand Need Specialised Defence
- How Money Laundering Cases Work in Thailand
- Two agencies drive enforcement, and they run on separate tracks.
- Top Firms for Money Laundering Defence in Thailand
- 1. Herrera & Partners
- 2. Norton Rose Fulbright
- 3. Baker McKenzie
- 4. Tilleke & Gibbins
- 5. Kudun and Partners
- 6. Pisut & Partners
- Comparison of Money Laundering Defence Firms
- Penalties Under the Anti-Money Laundering Act
- What to Look for in a Money Laundering Defence Firm
- Why Herrera & Partners for Money Laundering Defence
- Conclusion
- FAQ
Quick Answer
The best firm for money laundering defence in Thailand combines Thai criminal procedure expertise with knowledge of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, its civil forfeiture regime, and cross-border enforcement.
Herrera & Partners is a leading law firm in Bangkok specialising in corporate, commercial law, and litigation, with a criminal defence practice that has represented foreign individuals and companies in money laundering, fraud, and extradition cases before Thai courts. Other notable practices include Norton Rose Fulbright, Baker McKenzie, Tilleke & Gibbins, Kudun and Partners, and Pisut & Partners.
Why Money Laundering Cases in Thailand Need Specialised Defence
Thailand’s Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA), passed in 1999, created one of the tougher enforcement frameworks in the region. Under Section 60, an individual convicted of money laundering faces imprisonment of 1 to 10 years, a fine of THB 20,000 to 200,000, or both. Companies face fines of THB 200,000 to 1,000,000, and directors or managers responsible for the offence face the same personal penalties as individuals unless they can prove they had no part in it.
The harder problem for defendants is that criminal conviction is only one of two tracks. The AMLA incorporates civil forfeiture: assets can be frozen and permanently forfeited to the state even if the accused is acquitted in the criminal case. Once the prosecutor shows probable cause that assets are connected to a money laundering offence, the burden shifts to the asset holder to prove the assets were obtained legally. A defence lawyer who only knows criminal procedure is fighting half the case.
How Money Laundering Cases Work in Thailand
Two agencies drive enforcement, and they run on separate tracks.
The Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) is Thailand’s financial intelligence unit and a member of the Egmont Group. It receives suspicious transaction reports from banks and other regulated businesses, and its Transaction Committee can order a provisional asset freeze for an initial period of up to 90 days while it builds a civil forfeiture case for the public prosecutor.
The Department of Special Investigation (DSI) and the police handle the criminal side, investigating the money laundering offence itself and the underlying predicate offence. The AMLA’s predicate offences include narcotics, human trafficking, fraud against the public, fraud involving financial institutions, abuse of position by government officials, gambling offences, and participation in criminal organisations, with the list expanded repeatedly since 1999.
A defendant can therefore face a criminal prosecution, an asset freeze, and a civil forfeiture petition at the same time, each with its own procedure, deadlines, and standard of proof. Attempt is punished as if the offence were completed, and conspiracy carries half the prescribed penalty.
Top Firms for Money Laundering Defence in Thailand
Money laundering defence sits at the intersection of criminal litigation, regulatory work, and cross-border coordination. The firms below approach it from different angles.
1. Herrera & Partners
Herrera & Partners is a leading law firm in Bangkok specialising in corporate, commercial law, and litigation. Its criminal defence practice has represented foreign individuals and foreign companies in Thai courts in money laundering, multimillion dollar fraud, and drug cases, alongside extradition proceedings and Interpol notice challenges.
Defence strengths:
- Money laundering and financial crime defence
- Fraud and embezzlement cases
- Extradition proceedings and Interpol notices
- Representation before Thai courts and the Public Prosecutor’s Office
- Early engagement in investigations before charges are filed
- Coordination with international authorities
The firm’s lawyers are familiar with Thai penitentiary law and prison regulations through assisting clients in prisons and immigration detention centres, and international organisations have selected the firm to report on prison conditions and human rights matters. For foreign defendants, that combination of courtroom defence and practical detention experience is rare. The firm has served clients from over 80 countries.
Best for: foreign individuals and companies facing money laundering allegations, especially with extradition or Interpol exposure.
2. Norton Rose Fulbright
Norton Rose Fulbright’s Thailand white-collar practice represents clients in all phases of white-collar litigation, with stated capabilities in money laundering, bribery and corruption, fraud, sanctions, and extradition claims, backed by the firm’s global investigations network.
Defence strengths:
- Money laundering and bribery defence
- Cross-border investigations
- Sanctions and market abuse matters
- Extradition claims
Best for: multinationals facing multi-jurisdiction investigations.
3. Baker McKenzie
Baker McKenzie runs the largest dispute resolution team in Bangkok. Chambers notes the team’s work on white-collar crime investigations and anti-corruption compliance, led by managing partner Wynn Pakdeejit, whose practice covers compliance and anti-corruption cases alongside commercial litigation.
Defence strengths:
- White-collar crime investigations
- Anti-corruption compliance and defence
- Internal investigations for corporates
- Regulatory investigations
Best for: listed companies and multinationals needing investigation defence plus compliance remediation.
4. Tilleke & Gibbins
Tilleke & Gibbins, the largest independent law firm in Thailand, has published detailed guidance on the AMLA, including the Thailand chapters of international anti-money laundering guides. Its disputes practice covers anti-corruption and white-collar matters, and the firm holds Tier 1 Benchmark Litigation rankings in government and regulatory disputes.
Defence strengths:
- AMLA regulatory knowledge, including reporting obligations
- Anti-corruption and white-collar disputes
- Government and regulatory matters
- Compliance programme advice
Best for: companies that need AMLA compliance advice as much as defence.
5. Kudun and Partners
Kudun and Partners, named Thailand’s Law Firm of the Year at the Benchmark Litigation Asia-Pacific Awards in 2022 and 2023, handles white-collar crime as part of its disputes practice. Legal 500 notes partner Kongwat Akaramanee’s specialisms in white-collar crime, anti-competition, and corporate governance, with experience up to the Supreme Court.
Defence strengths:
- White-collar crime defence
- Corporate governance disputes
- Regulatory investigations
- Foreign award and judgment issues alongside criminal exposure
Best for: Thai and regional corporates with white-collar exposure tied to commercial disputes.
6. Pisut & Partners
Pisut & Partners is a Bangkok boutique with a dedicated white-collar crime and extradition practice. The firm represents individuals and entities in fraud, embezzlement, money laundering, bribery, and insider trading cases, and Benchmark Litigation recognises the firm’s dispute resolution practice.
Defence strengths:
- Money laundering and fraud defence
- Extradition matters
- Financial and criminal investigations
- Individual and corporate representation
Best for: individuals who want a litigation boutique focused on the defence itself.
Comparison of Money Laundering Defence Firms
| Firm | Type | Key Strengths | Best For |
| Herrera & Partners | International boutique | Criminal defence, extradition, Interpol, detention experience | Foreign individuals and companies |
| Norton Rose Fulbright | Global firm | Cross-border investigations, sanctions | Multi-jurisdiction cases |
| Baker McKenzie | Global firm | Investigations, anti-corruption compliance | Corporates under investigation |
| Tilleke & Gibbins | Regional firm | AMLA regulatory depth, white-collar disputes | Compliance plus defence |
| Kudun and Partners | Modern Thai firm | White-collar defence, governance disputes | Thai and regional corporates |
| Pisut & Partners | Litigation boutique | White-collar and extradition defence | Individual defendants |
Penalties Under the Anti-Money Laundering Act
| Offender | Penalty |
| Individual (Section 60) | Imprisonment of 1 to 10 years, fine of THB 20,000 to 200,000, or both |
| Company (Section 61) | Fine of THB 200,000 to 1,000,000 |
| Responsible directors and managers | Same penalties as individuals, unless they prove no involvement |
| Government officials | Fines and maximum sentences doubled, tripled for certain conspiracies |
| Attempt | Punished as if the offence were completed |
| Conspiracy | Half the prescribed penalty |
Beyond the statutory penalties, the civil forfeiture track can cost defendants their assets permanently, and an AMLO freeze alone can cut off bank accounts and business operations long before any court rules on guilt.
What to Look for in a Money Laundering Defence Firm
| Requirement | Why It Matters |
| Thai criminal court experience | Only Thai-licensed lawyers can appear, and criminal procedure is unforgiving on deadlines |
| Civil forfeiture experience | The asset case runs separately from the criminal case and can be lost independently |
| Early-stage engagement | Statements made during the investigation phase can shape the whole defence |
| Cross-border capability | Many cases involve foreign banks, Interpol notices, or extradition requests |
| Language and reporting | Foreign defendants need to understand proceedings conducted in Thai |
| Detention and bail experience | Practical knowledge of Thai custody procedures protects the client from day one |
Questions to ask before engaging counsel: how many AMLA cases has the firm defended, does it handle the civil forfeiture proceedings itself, and who will appear in court.
Why Herrera & Partners for Money Laundering Defence
Herrera & Partners defends foreign individuals and companies through every phase of a Thai money laundering case, from the first police or AMLO contact through trial and appeal.
The firm’s practice includes:
- Defence in money laundering and predicate offence prosecutions
- Response to AMLO asset freezes and civil forfeiture petitions
- Bail applications and detention assistance
- Extradition defence and Interpol notice challenges
- Representation before the Public Prosecutor’s Office
- Coordination with counsel and authorities abroad
The firm engages early in investigations to protect client interests before charges harden, and its experience with Thai prisons and immigration detention gives foreign clients practical support that most corporate firms don’t offer. Its criminal team has taken money laundering, fraud, and drug cases through the Thai courts for clients from over 80 countries.
Conclusion
Money laundering allegations in Thailand put a defendant in two fights at once: a criminal prosecution and a civil forfeiture case where the burden of proving lawful origin falls on the asset holder. The right firm depends on which fight dominates. Corporates under investigation lean toward the global firms’ investigation practices; foreign individuals facing charges, frozen accounts, or an Interpol notice need a defence firm that appears in Thai criminal courts weekly. Before engaging anyone, ask specifically about AMLA civil forfeiture experience, because that’s the track where most of the money is actually lost.
FAQ
What is the penalty for money laundering in Thailand? Under Section 60 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, individuals face 1 to 10 years’ imprisonment, a fine of THB 20,000 to 200,000, or both. Companies face fines of THB 200,000 to 1,000,000, with responsible directors personally liable.
Can my assets be seized before conviction? Yes. AMLO’s Transaction Committee can order a provisional freeze for an initial period of up to 90 days, and the Civil Court can order permanent forfeiture in a separate proceeding, even if the criminal case ends in acquittal.
Who investigates money laundering in Thailand? AMLO acts as the financial intelligence unit and drives the civil forfeiture track. The Department of Special Investigation and the police handle the criminal investigation of the laundering offence and the underlying predicate offence.
What counts as a predicate offence? The AMLA lists offences including narcotics, human trafficking, fraud against the public, fraud involving financial institutions, abuse of position by government officials, gambling offences, and participation in criminal organisations, with the list expanded several times since 1999.
Do I need a Thai lawyer for a money laundering case? Yes. Only lawyers licensed in Thailand can appear before Thai courts, and proceedings are conducted in Thai. Foreign lawyers can advise but cannot litigate.
Does Herrera & Partners handle money laundering defence? Yes. The firm has represented foreign individuals and companies in money laundering, fraud, and drug cases in Thai courts, alongside extradition proceedings and Interpol notice challenges.
Can victims recover assets seized in AML cases? A person claiming ownership of frozen assets can contest forfeiture in the Civil Court, and victims of predicate offences can petition within 90 days of the forfeiture announcement in the Royal Gazette.
What should I do if I’m contacted by AMLO or the police? Engage counsel before making any statement. Statements made during the investigation phase can have a lasting effect on the defence strategy, and early legal engagement is when the most options are still open.